#296 Romans 11, Israel and Covenant Theology
On tonight’s programme we look at Romans 11, especially Romans 11:26 and who ‘Israel’ is in this passage of scripture.
On tonight’s programme we look at Romans 11, especially Romans 11:26 and who ‘Israel’ is in this passage of scripture.
Amidst the recent news about Donald Trump and Israel’s capital Jerusalem, we look at views relating to modern day Israel shared among modern Christians. What is the historic Reformed view? Does it ignore ethnic and national Israel, as many claim, or does it actually support a future conversion of the Jews? On tonight’s programme we look at the views of David Cloud, Brannon Howse and Andy Woods and see if they are fair in their representations of Reformed Theology.
Does the Bible chart the history of the Church, from its beginning to the end of time? When did the Church begin? What is the connection between Israel and the Church? Is Dispensationalism Biblical? What is the future of Israel according to the flesh? What is postmillennialism, amillennialism and premillennialism? Is the book of Revelation for today, or for some future period known as ‘the great tribulation’? Should the book of Revelation be a comfort and an encouragement to believers?
[smart_track_player url=”https://soundcloud.com/megiddo-radio/214-scriptures-church-history-vs-dispensationalism” title=”#214 Scripture’s Church History Vs Dispensationalism” social=”true” social_twitter=”true” social_facebook=”true” social_gplus=”true” social_email=”true” ]
What is ‘Replacement Theology’ according to Dispensationalists? Is the label accurate or a vitriolic slur aimed against Covenant Theology? Does Covenant Theology really claim that the Church ‘replaces’ Israel? This show includes a critique of the views of Dr Michael L. Brown on this issue.
[smart_track_player url=”https://soundcloud.com/megiddo-radio/172-replacement-theology-a-vitrolic-slur-against-covenant-theolog” title=”#172 ‘Replacement Theology’: A Vitriolic Slur Against Covenant Theology?” social=”true” social_twitter=”true” social_facebook=”true” social_gplus=”true” social_email=”true” ]
Paul finishes his critique of John Hagee’s theology as seen in his books ‘Four Blood Moons’ and ‘In Defence of Israel’. How serious are Hagee’s errors?
[smart_track_player url=”https://soundcloud.com/megiddo-radio/153-john-hagee-denies-christ-came-to-be-the-messiah” title=”#153 John Hagee Denies Christ Came to be the Messiah” social=”true” social_twitter=”true” social_facebook=”true” social_gplus=”true” social_email=”true” ]